VT vs VTBNX
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF vs Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund Institutional Shares
Quick Verdict
VTBNX has a lower expense ratio. VT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VT offers more diversification with 8927 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VT | VTBNX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.02% | |
| AUM | $77.6B | $206.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.61% | 3.73% | |
| Holdings | 10,133 | 15,623 | |
| YTD Return | +14.35% | -2.60% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.56% | -1.88% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.65% | +0.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.08% | -3.56% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 6.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.6% | -21.5% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2008 | Feb 17, 2009 |
VT vs VTBNX Performance
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund Institutional Shares (VTBNX) is a mutual fund from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VT returned +23.56% while VTBNX returned -1.88%. Year to date, VT is up 14.35% versus a loss of 2.60% for VTBNX.
Over three years, VT compounded at +20.65% per year against +0.40% for VTBNX; over five years the annualized figures are +11.08% and -3.56% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VT has the edge at +7.37% annualized vs -3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 6.3% for VTBNX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.6% for VT and -21.5% for VTBNX. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VT charges 0.06% per year while VTBNX charges 0.02%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $2 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VT currently yields 1.61% against 3.73% for VTBNX.
Holdings Overlap
VT and VTBNX share 9 holdings out of 17016 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VT or VTBNX?
VT has an expense ratio of 0.06% while VTBNX charges 0.02%. VTBNX is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VT or VTBNX?
Over the past year VT returned +23.56% vs -1.88% for VTBNX, so VT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), VT annualized +7.37% vs -3.56% for VTBNX. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VT or VTBNX?
VT has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 6.3% for VTBNX. Worst drawdown: VT -50.6% vs VTBNX -21.5%.
Should I hold both VT and VTBNX?
VT and VTBNX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VT and VTBNX?
VT and VTBNX share 9 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 17016 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VT or VTBNX?
VT yields 1.61% while VTBNX yields 3.73%, so VTBNX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular Fund Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.