VOO vs VT
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
Which is better, VOO or VT?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VT over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.06% |
| AUM | $997.4B | $97.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.04% | 1.55% |
| Holdings | 509 | 10,133 |
| YTD Return | +11.01% | +11.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.60% | +16.64%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.82%Best | +19.89% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.60%Best | +10.40% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1%Best | 14.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3%Best | -34.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,101Best | $16,400 |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Jun 24, 2008 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 16, 2026 (16 years).
VOO vs VT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
VOO vs VT Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VOO returned +15.60% while VT returned +16.64%. Year to date, VOO is up 11.01% versus a gain of 11.44% for VT.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +20.82% per year against +19.89% for VT; over five years the annualized figures are +12.60% and +10.40% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.30% annualized vs +9.19%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -34.5% for VT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while VT charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $6 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.04% against 1.55% for VT.
Holdings Overlap
At least 94.0% of VOO's money is in holdings VT also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VT, our book for it covers 90.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of VOO is already inside VT. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
468 positions in common, counted across the 494 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 9,272 in VT, against full books of 509 and 10,133.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VOO | Weight in VT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.55% | 4.03% | 3.52% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.05% | 3.84% | 3.21% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.36% | 2.97% | 2.39% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.13% | 2.27% | 1.86% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.62% | 1.82% | 0.80% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.86% | 1.56% | 1.30% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 1.05% | 0.85% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.46% | 0.81% | 0.65% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.44% | 0.80% | 0.64% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.41% | 0.79% | 0.62% |
94.0% of VOO is already inside VT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or VT?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VT charges 0.06%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VOO or VT?
Over the past year VOO returned +15.60% vs +16.64% for VT, so VT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VOO annualized +13.30% vs +9.19% for VT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VOO or VT?
VT has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs VT -34.5%.
Should I hold both VOO and VT?
VOO and VT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and VT?
At least 94.0% of VOO's money is in holdings VT also owns. Our book for VT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 468 positions in common, counted across the 494 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 9,272 in VT.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or VT?
VOO yields 1.04% while VT yields 1.55%, so VT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VT better than VOO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VT over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.