VTI vs WANT
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | WANT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.00% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $21M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 0.54% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 54 | |
| YTD Return | +13.14% | -13.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.35% | -6.55% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.83% | +14.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.01% | -8.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 70.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -85.9% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Nov 29, 2018 |
VTI vs WANT Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X ETF (WANT) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year VTI returned +22.35% while WANT returned -6.55%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.14% versus a loss of 13.16% for WANT.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.83% per year against +14.40% for WANT; over five years the annualized figures are +12.01% and -8.30% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +7.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WANT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 70.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -85.9% for WANT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while WANT charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $100 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 0.54% for WANT.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and WANT share 43 holdings out of 2794 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or WANT?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WANT charges 1.00%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or WANT?
Over the past year VTI returned +22.35% vs -6.55% for WANT, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), VTI annualized +8.09% vs +7.44% for WANT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or WANT?
WANT has been the more volatile fund at 70.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs WANT -85.9%.
Should I hold both VTI and WANT?
VTI and WANT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and WANT?
VTI and WANT share 43 common holdings with a 8.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2794 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or WANT?
VTI yields 1.07% while WANT yields 0.54%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.