VTI vs WDNA
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Wisdomtree BioRevolution Fund
Which is better, VTI or WDNA?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, WDNA over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | WDNA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.45% |
| AUM | $666.9B | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 3.97% |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 87 |
| YTD Return | +13.59% | +36.41%Best |
| 1Y Return | +20.00% | +59.48%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.95%Best | +12.44% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.81%Best | -3.05% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7%Best | 23.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4%Best | -58.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,474Best | $8,565 |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Jun 3, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 3, 2021 to Sep 4, 2026 (5.3 years).
VTI vs WDNA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
VTI vs WDNA Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Wisdomtree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year VTI returned +20.00% while WDNA returned +59.48%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.59% versus a gain of 36.41% for WDNA.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +20.95% per year against +12.44% for WDNA; over five years the annualized figures are +11.81% and -3.05% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WDNA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.9% compared with 15.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for VTI and -58.9% for WDNA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while WDNA charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 3.97% for WDNA.
Holdings Overlap
At least 74.9% of WDNA's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of WDNA is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
55 positions in common, counted across the 2,787 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 79 in WDNA, against full books of 3,543 and 87.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VTI | Weight in WDNA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TWSTTwist Bioscience Corp. | 0.00% | 7.08% | 7.08% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.40% | 4.10% | 2.70% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.84% | 3.00% | 2.16% |
| MRNAModerna therapeutics | 0.03% | 3.48% | 3.45% |
| NTRANatera Inc | 0.05% | 2.67% | 2.62% |
| TXG10x Genomics Inc Com Usd 1 Cl A | 0.00% | 2.71% | 2.71% |
| IMNMImmunome Inc | 0.00% | 2.68% | 2.68% |
| UTHRUnited Therapeutics Corp | 0.03% | 2.36% | 2.33% |
| TEMTempus Pe | 0.00% | 2.12% | 2.12% |
| TMOThermo Fisherscientific Inc. | 0.26% | 1.78% | 1.52% |
74.9% of WDNA is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or WDNA?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WDNA charges 0.45%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VTI or WDNA?
Over the past year VTI returned +20.00% vs +59.48% for WDNA, so WDNA leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VTI or WDNA?
WDNA has been the more volatile fund at 23.9% annualized versus 15.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -25.4% vs WDNA -58.9%.
Should I hold both VTI and WDNA?
VTI and WDNA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and WDNA?
At least 74.9% of WDNA's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 55 positions in common, counted across the 2,787 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 79 in WDNA.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or WDNA?
VTI yields 1.07% while WDNA yields 3.97%, so WDNA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WDNA better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, WDNA over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.