VTI vs WDNA
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Wisdomtree BioRevolution Fund
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. WDNA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | WDNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.45% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $3M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 3.97% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 84 | |
| YTD Return | +14.82% | +24.89% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.43% | +47.08% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.93% | +8.67% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.34% | -3.80% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4% | 22.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -58.9% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | WisdomTree Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Jun 3, 2021 |
VTI vs WDNA Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Wisdomtree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year VTI returned +22.43% while WDNA returned +47.08%. Year to date, VTI is up 14.82% versus a gain of 24.89% for WDNA.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.93% per year against +8.67% for WDNA; over five years the annualized figures are +12.34% and -3.80% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -2.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WDNA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.9% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -58.9% for WDNA. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while WDNA charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 3.97% for WDNA.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and WDNA share 54 holdings out of 2816 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or WDNA?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WDNA charges 0.45%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or WDNA?
Over the past year VTI returned +22.43% vs +47.08% for WDNA, so WDNA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), VTI annualized +8.16% vs -2.79% for WDNA. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or WDNA?
WDNA has been the more volatile fund at 22.9% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs WDNA -58.9%.
Should I hold both VTI and WDNA?
VTI and WDNA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and WDNA?
VTI and WDNA share 54 common holdings with a 4.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2816 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or WDNA?
VTI yields 1.07% while WDNA yields 3.97%, so WDNA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.