VTI vs WTV
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs WisdomTree US Value Fund
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. WTV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | WTV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.12% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $3.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 1.86% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 118 | |
| YTD Return | +13.14% | +16.41% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.35% | +24.44% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.83% | +22.00% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.01% | +14.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 19.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -42.2% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | WisdomTree Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Feb 23, 2007 |
VTI vs WTV Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and WisdomTree US Value Fund (WTV) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year VTI returned +22.35% while WTV returned +24.44%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.14% versus a gain of 16.41% for WTV.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.83% per year against +22.00% for WTV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.01% and +14.03% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, WTV has the edge at +13.11% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WTV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -42.2% for WTV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while WTV charges 0.12%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $12 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 1.86% for WTV.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and WTV share 104 holdings out of 2807 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or WTV?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WTV charges 0.12%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $9 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or WTV?
Over the past year VTI returned +22.35% vs +24.44% for WTV, so WTV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), VTI annualized +8.09% vs +13.11% for WTV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or WTV?
WTV has been the more volatile fund at 19.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs WTV -42.2%.
Should I hold both VTI and WTV?
VTI and WTV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and WTV?
VTI and WTV share 104 common holdings with a 17.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2807 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or WTV?
VTI yields 1.07% while WTV yields 1.86%, so WTV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.