VTI vs WOMN
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Impact Shares Women's Empowerment ETF
Which is better, VTI or WOMN?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | WOMN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $666.9B | $59M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 0.79% |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 204 |
| YTD Return | +12.57%Best | +9.08% |
| 1Y Return | +17.22%Best | +11.71% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.87%Best | +14.20% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.86%Best | +8.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 16.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.0% | -32.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,514Best | $15,379 |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Impact shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Aug 24, 2018 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 28, 2018 to Sep 11, 2026 (8 years).
VTI vs WOMN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.
VTI vs WOMN Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Impact Shares Women's Empowerment ETF (WOMN) is an ETF from Impact shares. Over the past year VTI returned +17.22% while WOMN returned +11.71%. Year to date, VTI is up 12.57% versus a gain of 9.08% for WOMN.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +20.87% per year against +14.20% for WOMN; over five years the annualized figures are +11.86% and +8.99% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.21% annualized vs +12.68%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 16.6% for WOMN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.0% for VTI and -32.2% for WOMN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while WOMN charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 0.79% for WOMN.
Holdings Overlap
At least 98.2% of WOMN's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of WOMN is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 52 days apart, VTI as of Jun 30, 2026 and WOMN as of Aug 21, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
189 positions in common, counted across the 2,787 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 200 in WOMN, against full books of 3,543 and 204.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VTI | Weight in WOMN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 6.32% | 4.52% | 1.80% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 3.81% | 5.53% | 1.72% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 2.88% | 4.42% | 1.54% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 1.11% | 3.42% | 2.31% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.57% | 3.34% | 2.77% |
| VZVerizon Communications, Inc. | 0.22% | 3.08% | 2.86% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.78% | 2.48% | 1.70% |
| VVisa Inc | 0.77% | 2.33% | 1.56% |
| TXNTexas Instruments, Inc | 0.37% | 2.02% | 1.65% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.27% | 0.05% | 2.22% |
98.2% of WOMN is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or WOMN?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WOMN charges 0.75%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VTI or WOMN?
Over the past year VTI returned +17.22% vs +11.71% for WOMN, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), VTI annualized +13.21% vs +12.68% for WOMN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VTI or WOMN?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 16.6% for WOMN. Worst drawdown: VTI -35.0% vs WOMN -32.2%.
Should I hold both VTI and WOMN?
VTI and WOMN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and WOMN?
At least 98.2% of WOMN's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 189 positions in common, counted across the 2,787 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 200 in WOMN.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or WOMN?
VTI yields 1.03% while WOMN yields 0.79%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WOMN better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.