QQQ vs WOMN
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Impact Shares Women's Empowerment ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. WOMN offers more diversification with 204 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | WOMN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $59M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.81% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 204 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +10.59% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +15.18% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +15.46% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | +9.16% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 16.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -32.2% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Impact shares | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Aug 24, 2018 |
QQQ vs WOMN Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Impact Shares Women's Empowerment ETF (WOMN) is a ETF from Impact shares. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while WOMN returned +15.18%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 10.59% for WOMN.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +15.46% for WOMN; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and +9.16% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +12.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.7% for WOMN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -32.2% for WOMN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WOMN charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $75 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.81% for WOMN.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and WOMN share 32 holdings out of 273 unique holdings combined, representing a 26.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or WOMN?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WOMN charges 0.75%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or WOMN?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +15.18% for WOMN, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +12.98% for WOMN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or WOMN?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.7% for WOMN. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs WOMN -32.2%.
Should I hold both QQQ and WOMN?
QQQ and WOMN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and WOMN?
QQQ and WOMN share 32 common holdings with a 26.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 273 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WOMN?
QQQ yields 0.44% while WOMN yields 0.81%, so WOMN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.