ABLS vs ALIL
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF vs Argent Focused Small Cap ETF
Which is better, ABLS or ALIL?
ALIL has been ahead.
ABLS has a lower expense ratio. ALIL led over 1Y and the full window. ALIL is less concentrated, with 35.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLS | ALIL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.74% |
| AUM | $418,585.9 | $23M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 52 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +7.07%Best | +3.57% |
| 1Y Return | +6.01% | +7.05%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.3% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.2% | -12.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $11,062 | $11,126Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.4% | 35.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Abacus FCF Advisors | Argent |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 18, 2025 | Apr 9, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 9, 2025 to Oct 13, 2026 (1.5 years).
ABLS vs ALIL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
ABLS vs ALIL Performance
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) is an ETF from Abacus FCF Advisors and Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL) is an ETF from Argent. Over the past year ABLS returned +6.01% while ALIL returned +7.05%. Year to date, ABLS is up 7.07% versus a gain of 3.57% for ALIL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 15.1% for ALIL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.2% for ABLS and -12.6% for ALIL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLS charges 0.39% per year while ALIL charges 0.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $74 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLS currently yields 0.98% against 0.44% for ALIL.
Holdings Overlap
2.8% of ABLS's money is in holdings ALIL also owns. 4.6% of ALIL's money is in holdings ABLS also owns.
ALIL and ABLS share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABLS and 42 in ALIL, against full books of 52 and 43.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 38 positions for ALIL that do not appear in our book for ABLS (91.6% of the fund), and 45 for ABLS that do not appear in ALIL (93.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABLS and ALIL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLS or ALIL?
ABLS has an expense ratio of 0.39% while ALIL charges 0.74%. ABLS is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABLS or ALIL?
Over the past year ABLS returned +6.01% vs +7.05% for ALIL, so ALIL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ABLS annualized +6.96% vs +7.37% for ALIL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABLS or ALIL?
ABLS has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 15.1% for ALIL. Worst drawdown: ABLS -16.2% vs ALIL -12.6%.
Should I hold both ABLS and ALIL?
ABLS and ALIL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLS and ALIL?
4.6% of ALIL's money is in holdings ABLS also owns. 4.6% of ALIL's is in holdings ABLS also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABLS and 42 in ALIL.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLS or ALIL?
ABLS yields 0.98% while ALIL yields 0.44%, so ABLS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ALIL better than ABLS?
ABLS has a lower expense ratio. ALIL led over 1Y and the full window. ALIL is less concentrated, with 35.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.