ACEP vs SCHD

ACEP vs SCHD

Which is better, ACEP or SCHD?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. ACEP is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.

Lower Fees: SCHDLess Concentrated: ACEP

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACEPSCHD
Expense Ratio0.45%0.06%Best
AUM$103M$112.1B
Dividend Yield0.11%3.00%
Holdings38103
YTD Return+21.88%+24.23%Best
1Y Return-+27.90%
3Y Return (annualized)-+15.55%
5Y Return (annualized)-+9.97%
Top 10 Weight37.8%Best41.8%
Fund FamilyARS InvestmentCharles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionNov 20, 2025Oct 20, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ACEP vs SCHD growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ACEP vs SCHD Performance

ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) is an ETF from ARS Investment and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, ACEP is up 21.88% versus a gain of 24.23% for SCHD.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACEP charges 0.45% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $6 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACEP currently yields 0.11% against 3.00% for SCHD.

Holdings Overlap

ACEP already in SCHD23.3%
SCHD already in ACEP22.3%

23.3% of ACEP's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 22.3% of SCHD's money is in holdings ACEP also owns.

ACEP and SCHD share little of their money.

8 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in ACEP and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 38 and 103.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 91 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for ACEP (77.7% of the fund), and 21 for ACEP that do not appear in SCHD (61.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACEPWeight in SCHDDifference
CVXChevron Corp3.69%4.02%0.33%
BXBlackstone Group Inc. Class A3.58%2.59%0.99%
BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co.2.83%3.33%0.50%
ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc.3.11%2.79%0.32%
ACNAccenture Plc2.81%2.84%0.03%
CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa2.56%2.31%0.25%
QCOMQualcomm Inc.2.25%2.52%0.27%
EOGEog Resources Inc2.45%1.88%0.57%

23.3% of ACEP is already inside SCHD.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ACEPSCHD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACEP or SCHD?

ACEP has an expense ratio of 0.45% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $39 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ACEP and SCHD?

23.3% of ACEP's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 22.3% of SCHD's is in holdings ACEP also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in ACEP and 100 in SCHD.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACEP or SCHD?

ACEP yields 0.11% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SCHD better than ACEP?

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. ACEP is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.