ACEP vs QQQ

ACEP vs QQQ

Which is better, ACEP or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ACEP is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: ACEP

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACEPQQQ
Expense Ratio0.45%0.18%Best
AUM$103M$483.5B
Dividend Yield0.11%0.44%
Holdings38107
YTD Return+21.88%Best+17.21%
1Y Return-+22.10%
3Y Return (annualized)-+25.27%
5Y Return (annualized)-+14.60%
Top 10 Weight37.8%Best46.5%
Fund FamilyARS InvestmentInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionNov 20, 2025Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ACEP vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ACEP vs QQQ Performance

ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) is an ETF from ARS Investment and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, ACEP is up 21.88% versus a gain of 17.21% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACEP charges 0.45% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $18 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACEP currently yields 0.11% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

ACEP already in QQQ25.1%
QQQ already in ACEP15.7%

25.1% of ACEP's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 15.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings ACEP also owns.

ACEP and QQQ share little of their money.

9 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in ACEP and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 38 and 107.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 87 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for ACEP (81.8% of the fund), and 20 for ACEP that do not appear in QQQ (59.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACEPWeight in QQQDifference
AAPLApple, Inc2.18%7.27%5.09%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.00%3.16%0.84%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity3.89%1.69%2.20%
STXSeagate Technology Holdings Plc4.00%0.83%3.17%
ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc.3.11%0.47%2.64%
QCOMQualcomm Inc.2.25%0.73%1.52%
CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa2.56%0.39%2.17%
ADIAnalog Devices, Inc.1.76%0.81%0.95%
HONHoneywell International Inc.1.36%0.35%1.01%

25.1% of ACEP is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ACEPQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACEP or QQQ?

ACEP has an expense ratio of 0.45% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ACEP and QQQ?

25.1% of ACEP's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 15.7% of QQQ's is in holdings ACEP also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in ACEP and 102 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACEP or QQQ?

ACEP yields 0.11% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than ACEP?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ACEP is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.