ACEP vs IVV

ACEP vs IVV

Which is better, ACEP or IVV?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACEPIVV
Expense Ratio0.45%0.03%Best
AUM$103M$876.4B
Dividend Yield0.11%1.06%
Holdings38508
YTD Return+21.88%Best+12.27%
1Y Return-+17.04%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.24%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.08%
Top 10 Weight37.8%Tie37.8%Tie
Fund FamilyARS InvestmentiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 20, 2025May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ACEP vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ACEP vs IVV Performance

ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) is an ETF from ARS Investment and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ACEP is up 21.88% versus a gain of 12.27% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACEP charges 0.45% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACEP currently yields 0.11% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

ACEP already in IVV71.5%
IVV already in ACEP17.0%

71.5% of ACEP's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 17.0% of IVV's money is in holdings ACEP also owns.

Most of ACEP is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

25 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in ACEP and 490 in IVV, against full books of 38 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 457 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ACEP (81.7% of the fund), and 4 for ACEP that do not appear in IVV (12.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACEPWeight in IVVDifference
AAPLApple, Inc2.18%7.02%4.84%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.00%2.65%1.35%
JPMJpmorgan Chase3.70%1.44%2.26%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity3.89%0.57%3.32%
STXSeagate Technology Holdings Plc4.00%0.28%3.72%
CVXChevron Corp3.69%0.58%3.11%
PHParker-Hannifin Corp.3.80%0.19%3.61%
BXBlackstone Group Inc. Class A3.58%0.16%3.42%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common2.72%0.97%1.75%
TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred3.56%0.10%3.46%

71.5% of ACEP is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ACEPIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACEP or IVV?

ACEP has an expense ratio of 0.45% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ACEP and IVV?

71.5% of ACEP's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 17.0% of IVV's is in holdings ACEP also owns. They hold 25 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in ACEP and 490 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACEP or IVV?

ACEP yields 0.11% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than ACEP?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.