AESR vs IAE

AESR vs IAE

Which is better, AESR or IAE?

AESR has been ahead.

AESR has a lower expense ratio. AESR led over 1Y and the full window. IAE is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 84.6%.

Lower Fees: AESRHigher Returns: AESRLess Concentrated: IAE

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAESRIAE
Expense Ratio0.97%Best1.21%
AUM$257M$95M
Dividend Yield0.00%8.68%
Holdings66271
Volatility (annualized)17.6%Best20.5%
Max Drawdown-31.1%Best-39.2%
$10,000 over 6.8 years$26,720Best$15,463
Top 10 Weight84.6%38.1%Best
Fund FamilyHorizon FundsVoya Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 16, 2019Mar 27, 2007

Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).

The two price series end 8 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. AESR has data through Oct 21, 2026 and IAE through Oct 13, 2026.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 6.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 17, 2019 to Oct 13, 2026 (6.8 years).

Compare AESR against instead:AESR vs SPYAESR vs QQQAESR vs VOOAESR vs VTIIAE against:IAE vs VXUS

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IAE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 17.6% for AESR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.1% for AESR and -39.2% for IAE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AESR charges 0.97% per year while IAE charges 1.21%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $121 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AESR currently yields 0.00% against 8.68% for IAE.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 32 holdings in AESR and 248 in IAE, totalling 100.1% and 98.4% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in AESR and 248 in IAE, against full books of 66 and 271.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 8 positions for IAE that do not appear in our book for AESR (3.8% of the fund), and 29 for AESR that do not appear in IAE (97.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of AESR and IAE you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

AESRIAE

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AESR or IAE?

AESR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while IAE charges 1.21%. AESR is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which is riskier, AESR or IAE?

IAE has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 17.6% for AESR. Worst drawdown: AESR -31.1% vs IAE -39.2%.

Should I hold both AESR and IAE?

AESR and IAE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, AESR or IAE?

AESR yields 0.00% while IAE yields 8.68%, so IAE currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IAE better than AESR?

AESR has a lower expense ratio. AESR led over 1Y and the full window. IAE is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 84.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.