AGD vs IVV
Abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGD | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $325M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.69% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 88 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +14.38% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.96% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.20% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.32% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 26, 2006 | May 15, 2000 |
AGD vs IVV Performance
Abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund (AGD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AGD returned +19.96% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, AGD is up 14.38% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, AGD compounded at +23.20% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +10.32% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs -3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AGD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.3% for AGD and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGD charges 1.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $135 vs $3 annually, a gap of $132 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGD currently yields 11.69% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
AGD and IVV share 40 holdings out of 551 unique holdings combined, representing a 20.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGD or IVV?
AGD has an expense ratio of 1.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $132 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AGD or IVV?
Over the past year AGD returned +19.96% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), AGD annualized -3.20% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AGD or IVV?
AGD has been the more volatile fund at 23.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: AGD -88.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both AGD and IVV?
AGD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AGD and IVV?
AGD and IVV share 40 common holdings with a 20.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 551 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGD or IVV?
AGD yields 11.69% while IVV yields 1.10%, so AGD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.