AIEQ vs PCLG
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF vs Polen Focus Growth ETF
Which is better, AIEQ or PCLG?
AIEQ has been ahead.
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. AIEQ led over 1Y and the full window. AIEQ is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AIEQ | PCLG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $108M | $89M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.40% | 0.04% |
| Holdings | 329 | 58 |
| YTD Return | +7.98%Best | -8.53% |
| 1Y Return | +7.91%Best | -11.15% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.15% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.82% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.0%Best | 17.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.1%Best | -23.8% |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $10,885Best | $8,949 |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.5%Best | 63.4% |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Polen Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 17, 2017 | Sep 30, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1.1 years).
AIEQ vs PCLG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
AIEQ vs PCLG Performance
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) is an ETF from Polen Capital. Over the past year AIEQ returned +7.91% while PCLG returned -11.15%. Year to date, AIEQ is up 7.98% versus a loss of 8.53% for PCLG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PCLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 13.0% for AIEQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.1% for AIEQ and -23.8% for PCLG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AIEQ charges 0.75% per year while PCLG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $49 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AIEQ currently yields 0.40% against 0.04% for PCLG.
Holdings Overlap
29.3% of AIEQ's money is in holdings PCLG also owns. 68.3% of PCLG's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 161 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 29 in PCLG, against full books of 329 and 58.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for PCLG that do not appear in our book for AIEQ (24.2% of the fund), and 145 for AIEQ that do not appear in PCLG (70.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AIEQ | Weight in PCLG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 9.02% | 5.68% | 3.34% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.26% | 9.51% | 7.25% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.71% | 7.35% | 3.64% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 4.00% | 5.94% | 1.94% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.82% | 6.06% | 3.24% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.28% | 6.16% | 4.88% |
| NOWServicenow, Inc. | 0.05% | 6.87% | 6.82% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.99% | 4.28% | 3.29% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 0.06% | 5.07% | 5.01% |
| GEVGe Vernova | 3.50% | 1.58% | 1.92% |
68.3% of PCLG is already inside AIEQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AIEQ or PCLG?
AIEQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while PCLG charges 0.49%. PCLG is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AIEQ or PCLG?
Over the past year AIEQ returned +7.91% vs -11.15% for PCLG, so AIEQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AIEQ annualized +8.01% vs -9.60% for PCLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AIEQ or PCLG?
PCLG has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 13.0% for AIEQ. Worst drawdown: AIEQ -9.1% vs PCLG -23.8%.
Should I hold both AIEQ and PCLG?
AIEQ and PCLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AIEQ and PCLG?
68.3% of PCLG's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns. 68.3% of PCLG's is in holdings AIEQ also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 161 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 29 in PCLG.
Which pays a higher dividend, AIEQ or PCLG?
AIEQ yields 0.40% while PCLG yields 0.04%, so AIEQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PCLG better than AIEQ?
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. AIEQ led over 1Y and the full window. AIEQ is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.