AKRE vs VTI
Akre Focus ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, AKRE or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AKRE | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5.3B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 21 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -12.08% | +12.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.22% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.87% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Fund Family | AKRE Capital Management, LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
AKRE vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AKRE vs VTI Performance
Akre Focus ETF (AKRE) is an ETF from AKRE Capital Management, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, AKRE is down 12.08% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AKRE charges 0.98% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $3 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AKRE currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 70.0% of AKRE's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, AKRE as of Aug 17, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
13 positions in common, counted across the 17 positions we hold weights for in AKRE and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 21 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AKRE | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAMastercard Inc | 13.67% | 0.56% | 13.11% |
| VVisa Inc | 6.94% | 0.77% | 6.17% |
| KKRKkr & Co. Inc. Class a | 7.58% | 0.08% | 7.50% |
| ROPRoper Technologies Inc. | 7.09% | 0.05% | 7.04% |
| MCOMoody'S Corp. | 6.77% | 0.09% | 6.68% |
| FICOFair Isaac Corp. | 5.64% | 0.04% | 5.60% |
| CSGPCostar Group Inc. | 5.06% | 0.02% | 5.04% |
| CPRTCopart Inc | 4.22% | 0.03% | 4.19% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 3.36% | 0.08% | 3.28% |
| CCCSCCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc | 3.40% | 0.00% | 3.40% |
70.0% of AKRE is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AKRE or VTI?
AKRE has an expense ratio of 0.98% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $95 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between AKRE and VTI?
At least 70.0% of AKRE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 17 positions we hold weights for in AKRE and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, AKRE or VTI?
AKRE yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than AKRE?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.