ANTW vs QQQ

ANTW vs QQQ

Which is better, ANTW or QQQ?

QQQ costs less.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.1%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricANTWQQQ
Expense Ratio0.59%0.18%Best
AUM$6M$483.5B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.44%
Holdings25107
YTD Return-4.57%+15.21%Best
1Y Return-+19.78%
3Y Return (annualized)-+24.58%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.93%
Top 10 Weight58.1%46.5%Best
Fund FamilyHarbor FundsInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionAug 12, 2026Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ANTW vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ANTW vs QQQ Performance

Anthropic AI Lab Ecosystem ETF (ANTW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, ANTW is down 4.57% versus a gain of 15.21% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ANTW charges 0.59% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $18 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ANTW currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

ANTW already in QQQ55.0%
QQQ already in ANTW36.3%

55.0% of ANTW's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 36.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings ANTW also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

12 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in ANTW and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 25 and 107.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 84 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for ANTW (61.2% of the fund), and 11 for ANTW that do not appear in QQQ (39.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ANTWWeight in QQQDifference
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A9.32%3.36%5.96%
NVDANvidia Corp3.75%8.44%4.69%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc7.36%4.67%2.69%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.67%5.76%0.09%
AVGOBroadcom Inc5.71%3.16%2.55%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc5.36%3.45%1.91%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4.01%4.43%0.42%
ALABAstera Labs Inc - Common3.63%0.24%3.39%
MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd.2.71%0.81%1.90%
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies2.57%0.91%1.66%

55.0% of ANTW is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ANTWQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ANTW or QQQ?

ANTW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ANTW and QQQ?

55.0% of ANTW's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 36.3% of QQQ's is in holdings ANTW also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in ANTW and 102 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, ANTW or QQQ?

ANTW yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than ANTW?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.