ANTW vs VOO

ANTW vs VOO

Which is better, ANTW or VOO?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.1%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricANTWVOO
Expense Ratio0.59%0.03%Best
AUM$6M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings25509
YTD Return-4.57%+11.01%Best
1Y Return-+15.60%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.82%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.60%
Top 10 Weight58.1%37.6%Best
Fund FamilyHarbor FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 12, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ANTW vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ANTW vs VOO Performance

Anthropic AI Lab Ecosystem ETF (ANTW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, ANTW is down 4.57% versus a gain of 11.01% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ANTW charges 0.59% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ANTW currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

ANTW already in VOO65.8%
VOO already in ANTW27.3%

65.8% of ANTW's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 27.3% of VOO's money is in holdings ANTW also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

16 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in ANTW and 494 in VOO, against full books of 25 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 471 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for ANTW (71.9% of the fund), and 7 for ANTW that do not appear in VOO (28.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ANTWWeight in VOODifference
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A9.32%3.24%6.08%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc7.36%4.13%3.23%
NVDANvidia Corp3.75%7.55%3.80%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.67%5.36%0.31%
AVGOBroadcom Inc5.71%2.86%2.85%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc5.36%1.21%4.15%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4.01%1.44%2.57%
BXBlackstone Group Inc. Class A3.55%0.15%3.40%
AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc3.00%0.11%2.89%
APOAthene (Ath) / Apollo Global Management (Apo)2.98%0.09%2.89%

65.8% of ANTW is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ANTWVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ANTW or VOO?

ANTW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ANTW and VOO?

65.8% of ANTW's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 27.3% of VOO's is in holdings ANTW also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in ANTW and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, ANTW or VOO?

ANTW yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than ANTW?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.