AOD vs INCE

Quick Verdict

INCE has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. AOD offers more diversification with 85 holdings.

Lower Fees: INCEHigher Returns: AODMore Diversified: AOD

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAODINCEWinner
Expense Ratio1.16%0.29%
AUM$1.0B$132M
Dividend Yield11.72%4.82%
Holdings8682
YTD Return+18.03%+15.94%
1Y Return+34.72%+26.30%
3Y Return (annualized)+22.88%+16.63%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.28%+10.93%
Volatility (annualized)21.9%13.8%
Max Drawdown-88.1%-34.1%
Fund FamilyAberdeenFranklin Templeton Investments (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJan 26, 2007Sep 20, 2016

AOD vs INCE Performance

Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year AOD returned +34.72% while INCE returned +26.30%. Year to date, AOD is up 18.03% versus a gain of 15.94% for INCE.

Over three years, AOD compounded at +22.88% per year against +16.63% for INCE; over five years the annualized figures are +11.28% and +10.93% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, INCE has the edge at +12.53% annualized vs -4.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 13.8% for INCE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -34.1% for INCE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AOD charges 1.16% per year while INCE charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $29 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.72% against 4.82% for INCE.

Holdings Overlap

12.0%overlap

AOD and INCE share 12 holdings out of 120 unique holdings combined, representing a 12.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AODWeight in INCEDifference
RIO:LN1.40%2.28%0.88%
LMT0.81%2.74%1.93%
JPM:US1.47%1.60%0.13%
TTE:PAProProPro
KOProProPro
NEEProProPro
HONProProPro
AZN:LNProProPro
BACProProPro
ORCLProProPro
See all 10 holdings AOD shares with INCE
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AOD or INCE?

AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while INCE charges 0.29%. INCE is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.

Which performed better, AOD or INCE?

Over the past year AOD returned +34.72% vs +26.30% for INCE, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), AOD annualized -4.05% vs +12.53% for INCE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, AOD or INCE?

AOD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 13.8% for INCE. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs INCE -34.1%.

Should I hold both AOD and INCE?

AOD and INCE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between AOD and INCE?

AOD and INCE share 12 common holdings with a 12.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 120 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or INCE?

AOD yields 11.72% while INCE yields 4.82%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →