ATFV vs HUMM
Alger 35 ETF vs 800VDC AI Datacenter Ecosystem ETF
Which is better, ATFV or HUMM?
HUMM costs less.
HUMM has a lower expense ratio. HUMM is less concentrated, with 49.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ATFV | HUMM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $888M | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.20% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 74 | 66 |
| YTD Return | -3.82%Best | -20.69% |
| 1Y Return | -3.01% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.55% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.84% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.4% | 49.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Alger | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 4, 2021 | Sep 16, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ATFV vs HUMM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ATFV vs HUMM Performance
Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) is an ETF from Alger and 800VDC AI Datacenter Ecosystem ETF (HUMM) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, ATFV is down 3.82% versus a loss of 20.69% for HUMM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ATFV charges 0.56% per year while HUMM charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $49 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ATFV currently yields 0.20% against 0.00% for HUMM.
Holdings Overlap
0.8% of ATFV's money is in holdings HUMM also owns. 4.8% of HUMM's money is in holdings ATFV also owns.
HUMM and ATFV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in ATFV and 24 in HUMM, against full books of 74 and 66.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 14 positions for HUMM that do not appear in our book for ATFV (62.0% of the fund), and 30 for ATFV that do not appear in HUMM (93.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ATFV | Weight in HUMM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6723:JPRenesas Electronics Corp | 0.84% | 4.75% | 3.91% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ATFV and HUMM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ATFV or HUMM?
ATFV has an expense ratio of 0.56% while HUMM charges 0.49%. HUMM is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ATFV and HUMM?
4.8% of HUMM's money is in holdings ATFV also owns. 4.8% of HUMM's is in holdings ATFV also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in ATFV and 24 in HUMM.
Which pays a higher dividend, ATFV or HUMM?
ATFV yields 0.20% while HUMM yields 0.00%, so ATFV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HUMM better than ATFV?
HUMM has a lower expense ratio. HUMM is less concentrated, with 49.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.