ATFV vs OAIW
Alger 35 ETF vs OpenAI Lab Ecosystem ETF
Which is better, ATFV or OAIW?
ATFV costs less.
ATFV has a lower expense ratio. ATFV is less concentrated, with 55.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ATFV | OAIW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $888M | $5M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.20% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 74 | 52 |
| YTD Return | +0.94%Best | -18.29% |
| 1Y Return | +0.67% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +32.31% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.61% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.4%Best | 62.4% |
| Fund Family | Alger | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 4, 2021 | Aug 12, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ATFV vs OAIW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ATFV vs OAIW Performance
Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) is an ETF from Alger and OpenAI Lab Ecosystem ETF (OAIW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, ATFV is up 0.94% versus a loss of 18.29% for OAIW.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ATFV charges 0.56% per year while OAIW charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $59 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ATFV currently yields 0.20% against 0.00% for OAIW.
Holdings Overlap
33.4% of ATFV's money is in holdings OAIW also owns. 32.6% of OAIW's money is in holdings ATFV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
6 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in ATFV and 25 in OAIW, against full books of 74 and 52.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 14 positions for OAIW that do not appear in our book for ATFV (45.6% of the fund), and 25 for ATFV that do not appear in OAIW (62.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
33.4% of ATFV is already inside OAIW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ATFV or OAIW?
ATFV has an expense ratio of 0.56% while OAIW charges 0.59%. ATFV is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ATFV and OAIW?
33.4% of ATFV's money is in holdings OAIW also owns. 32.6% of OAIW's is in holdings ATFV also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in ATFV and 25 in OAIW.
Which pays a higher dividend, ATFV or OAIW?
ATFV yields 0.20% while OAIW yields 0.00%, so ATFV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is OAIW better than ATFV?
ATFV has a lower expense ratio. ATFV is less concentrated, with 55.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.