AVRY vs IVV

AVRY vs IVV

Which is better, AVRY or IVV?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.3%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAVRYIVV
Expense Ratio0.89%0.03%Best
AUM$68M$876.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings28508
YTD Return-2.67%+13.32%Best
1Y Return-+17.08%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.72%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.20%
Top 10 Weight58.3%37.8%Best
Fund FamilyAvory & Company., LLCiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 21, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AVRY vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

AVRY vs IVV Performance

Avory Foundational ETF (AVRY) is an ETF from Avory & Company., LLC and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, AVRY is down 2.67% versus a gain of 13.32% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AVRY charges 0.89% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVRY currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

AVRY already in IVV39.5%
IVV already in AVRY7.7%

39.5% of AVRY's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 7.7% of IVV's money is in holdings AVRY also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

10 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in AVRY and 490 in IVV, against full books of 28 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 472 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for AVRY (90.9% of the fund), and 15 for AVRY that do not appear in IVV (56.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AVRYWeight in IVVDifference
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc5.31%3.84%1.47%
SQBlock Inc7.57%0.07%7.50%
METAMeta Platforms Inc4.41%1.90%2.51%
ABNBAirbnb Inc5.57%0.12%5.45%
BXBlackstone Group Inc. Class A5.44%0.16%5.28%
CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity2.76%0.32%2.44%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares2.36%0.66%1.70%
SBUXStarbucks Corp2.82%0.18%2.64%
UBERUber Technologies Inc1.69%0.23%1.46%
NEENextera Energy Inc1.53%0.26%1.27%

39.5% of AVRY is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AVRYIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AVRY or IVV?

AVRY has an expense ratio of 0.89% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AVRY and IVV?

39.5% of AVRY's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 7.7% of IVV's is in holdings AVRY also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in AVRY and 490 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, AVRY or IVV?

AVRY yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than AVRY?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.