AVTM vs NBDS
Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF vs Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
Which is better, AVTM or NBDS?
AVTM costs less.
AVTM has a lower expense ratio. AVTM is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVTM | NBDS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.22%Best | 0.40% |
| AUM | - | $177M |
| Dividend Yield | - | 0.33% |
| Holdings | 3,399 | 32 |
| YTD Return | +11.82% | +16.17%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +12.66% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.87% |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.3%Best | 46.6% |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | Neuberger Berman |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 29, 2026 | Apr 6, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
AVTM vs NBDS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AVTM vs NBDS Performance
Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM) is an ETF from Avantis Investors and Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman. Year to date, AVTM is up 11.82% versus a gain of 16.17% for NBDS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVTM charges 0.22% per year while NBDS charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $22 vs $40 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
10.1% of AVTM's money is in holdings NBDS also owns. 49.6% of NBDS's money is in holdings AVTM also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 947 positions we hold weights for in AVTM and 32 in NBDS, against full books of 3,399 and 32.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 13 positions for NBDS that do not appear in our book for AVTM (34.0% of the fund), and 656 for AVTM that do not appear in NBDS (84.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AVTM | Weight in NBDS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.68% | 7.46% | 1.78% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 0.41% | 5.41% | 5.00% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.17% | 2.69% | 0.52% |
| SNOWSnowflake Inc | 0.03% | 4.80% | 4.77% |
| HOODRobinhood Markets Inc - A | 0.02% | 3.92% | 3.90% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.06% | 2.82% | 1.76% |
| GKOSGlaukos Corp. | 0.00% | 3.88% | 3.88% |
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 0.03% | 3.57% | 3.54% |
| NOWServicenow, Inc | 0.05% | 2.97% | 2.92% |
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 0.01% | 2.69% | 2.68% |
49.6% of NBDS is already inside AVTM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVTM or NBDS?
AVTM has an expense ratio of 0.22% while NBDS charges 0.40%. AVTM is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between AVTM and NBDS?
49.6% of NBDS's money is in holdings AVTM also owns. 49.6% of NBDS's is in holdings AVTM also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 947 positions we hold weights for in AVTM and 32 in NBDS.
Is NBDS better than AVTM?
AVTM has a lower expense ratio. AVTM is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.