AVTM vs IVV
Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AVTM or IVV?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVTM | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.22% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | - | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 1,663 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +10.28% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.6% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 29, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
AVTM vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AVTM vs IVV Performance
Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM) is an ETF from Avantis Investors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, AVTM is up 10.28% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVTM charges 0.22% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $22 vs $3 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
67.3% of AVTM's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 91.9% of IVV's money is in holdings AVTM also owns.
Most of IVV is already inside AVTM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
371 positions in common, counted across the 1,214 positions we hold weights for in AVTM and 490 in IVV, against full books of 1,663 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 116 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for AVTM (7.3% of the fund), and 360 for AVTM that do not appear in IVV (28.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AVTM | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.97% | 8.07% | 2.10% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.54% | 7.02% | 2.48% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.27% | 5.69% | 2.42% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.04% | 3.84% | 1.80% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.80% | 2.39% | 0.41% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 1.10% | 3.00% | 1.90% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.99% | 1.90% | 0.09% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.00% | 2.65% | 1.65% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.95% | 1.44% | 0.51% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.39% | 1.63% | 0.24% |
91.9% of IVV is already inside AVTM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVTM or IVV?
AVTM has an expense ratio of 0.22% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $19 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between AVTM and IVV?
91.9% of IVV's money is in holdings AVTM also owns. 91.9% of IVV's is in holdings AVTM also owns. They hold 371 positions in common, counted across the 1,214 positions we hold weights for in AVTM and 490 in IVV.
Is IVV better than AVTM?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.