BAFE vs GDV

BAFE vs GDV

Which is better, BAFE or GDV?

GDV has been ahead.

BAFE has a lower expense ratio. GDV led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: BAFEHigher Returns: GDV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBAFEGDV
Expense Ratio0.54%Best1.30%
AUM$1.7B$3.3B
Dividend Yield0.27%5.41%
Holdings87766
YTD Return+10.96%+11.00%Best
1Y Return+13.58%+14.45%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.36%
5Y Return (annualized)-+7.88%
Volatility (annualized)12.9%12.4%Best
Max Drawdown-18.4%-18.2%Best
$10,000 over 2 years$12,173$13,444Best
Fund FamilyBrown AdvisoryGabelli Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 18, 2024Nov 28, 2003

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 18, 2024 to Nov 11, 2026 (2 years).

BAFE vs GDV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.

Compare BAFE against instead:BAFE vs SPYBAFE vs QQQBAFE vs VOOBAFE vs VTIGDV against:GDV vs VXUS

BAFE vs GDV Performance

Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust (GDV) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds. Over the past year BAFE returned +13.58% while GDV returned +14.45%. Year to date, BAFE is up 10.96% versus a gain of 11.00% for GDV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BAFE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 12.4% for GDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for BAFE and -18.2% for GDV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BAFE charges 0.54% per year while GDV charges 1.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $130 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAFE currently yields 0.27% against 5.41% for GDV.

Holdings Overlap

BAFE already in GDV74.5%

At least 74.5% of BAFE's money is in holdings GDV also owns.

Stated as a floor: for GDV, our book for it covers 91.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

Most of BAFE is already inside GDV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

The two holdings books were reported 107 days apart, BAFE as of Oct 15, 2026 and GDV as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

26 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in BAFE and 709 in GDV, against full books of 87 and 766.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BAFEWeight in GDVDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp6.70%1.13%5.57%
2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd7.32%0.15%7.17%
MAMastercard Inc3.97%1.89%2.08%
METAMeta Platforms Inc4.70%0.56%4.14%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.46%0.80%3.66%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C3.60%1.63%1.97%
VVisa Inc Class A4.50%0.40%4.10%
NVDANvidia Corp3.68%1.19%2.49%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.79%0.26%3.53%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity2.53%0.65%1.88%

74.5% of BAFE is already inside GDV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BAFEGDV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BAFE or GDV?

BAFE has an expense ratio of 0.54% while GDV charges 1.30%. BAFE is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BAFE or GDV?

Over the past year BAFE returned +13.58% vs +14.45% for GDV, so GDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BAFE annualized +10.33% vs +15.95% for GDV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BAFE or GDV?

BAFE has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 12.4% for GDV. Worst drawdown: BAFE -18.4% vs GDV -18.2%.

Should I hold both BAFE and GDV?

BAFE and GDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between BAFE and GDV?

At least 74.5% of BAFE's money is in holdings GDV also owns. Our book for GDV is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in BAFE and 709 in GDV.

Which pays a higher dividend, BAFE or GDV?

BAFE yields 0.27% while GDV yields 5.41%, so GDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is GDV better than BAFE?

BAFE has a lower expense ratio. GDV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.