BAFE vs HIDV
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF vs AB US High Dividend ETF
Which is better, BAFE or HIDV?
HIDV has been ahead.
HIDV has a lower expense ratio. HIDV led over 1Y and the full window. HIDV is less concentrated, with 36.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAFE | HIDV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.35%Best |
| AUM | $1.8B | $205M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 2.56% |
| Holdings | 90 | 108 |
| YTD Return | +9.97% | +11.94%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.65% | +17.30%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 12.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,035 | $12,846Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.4% | 36.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | AllianceBernstein L.P. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 18, 2024 | Mar 22, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
BAFE vs HIDV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
BAFE vs HIDV Performance
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P.. Over the past year BAFE returned +12.65% while HIDV returned +17.30%. Year to date, BAFE is up 9.97% versus a gain of 11.94% for HIDV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BAFE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 12.2% for HIDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for BAFE and -18.8% for HIDV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAFE charges 0.54% per year while HIDV charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $35 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAFE currently yields 0.27% against 2.56% for HIDV.
Holdings Overlap
39.6% of BAFE's money is in holdings HIDV also owns. 31.8% of HIDV's money is in holdings BAFE also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in BAFE and 107 in HIDV, against full books of 90 and 108.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 92 positions for HIDV that do not appear in our book for BAFE (66.2% of the fund), and 27 for BAFE that do not appear in HIDV (43.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BAFE | Weight in HIDV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.84% | 9.45% | 5.61% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.49% | 5.27% | 1.22% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.90% | 7.03% | 5.13% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.42% | 2.92% | 1.50% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.72% | 3.00% | 0.72% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.60% | 1.57% | 3.03% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 3.54% | 1.62% | 1.92% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.22% | 0.13% | 4.09% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 3.73% | 0.25% | 3.48% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 3.11% | 0.60% | 2.51% |
39.6% of BAFE is already inside HIDV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAFE or HIDV?
BAFE has an expense ratio of 0.54% while HIDV charges 0.35%. HIDV is the cheaper option, by $19 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BAFE or HIDV?
Over the past year BAFE returned +12.65% vs +17.30% for HIDV, so HIDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BAFE annualized +10.24% vs +14.09% for HIDV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BAFE or HIDV?
BAFE has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 12.2% for HIDV. Worst drawdown: BAFE -18.4% vs HIDV -18.8%.
Should I hold both BAFE and HIDV?
BAFE and HIDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BAFE and HIDV?
39.6% of BAFE's money is in holdings HIDV also owns. 31.8% of HIDV's is in holdings BAFE also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in BAFE and 107 in HIDV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAFE or HIDV?
BAFE yields 0.27% while HIDV yields 2.56%, so HIDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HIDV better than BAFE?
HIDV has a lower expense ratio. HIDV led over 1Y and the full window. HIDV is less concentrated, with 36.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.