BCGD vs FFND
Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF vs One Global ETF
Which is better, BCGD or FFND?
FFND has been ahead.
BCGD has a lower expense ratio. FFND led over 1Y. FFND is less concentrated, with 27.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCGD | FFND |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75%Best | 1.00% |
| AUM | - | $92M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.62% |
| Holdings | 79 | 177 |
| YTD Return | +0.37% | +1.19%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.41% | +3.68%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.23% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +2.41% |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.5% | 27.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Baron Funds | The Future Fund |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2025 | Aug 24, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BCGD vs FFND growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BCGD vs FFND Performance
Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF (BCGD) is an ETF from Baron Funds and One Global ETF (FFND) is an ETF from The Future Fund. Over the past year BCGD returned +1.41% while FFND returned +3.68%. Year to date, BCGD is up 0.37% versus a gain of 1.19% for FFND.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCGD charges 0.75% per year while FFND charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $100 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCGD currently yields 0.00% against 0.62% for FFND.
Holdings Overlap
31.2% of BCGD's money is in holdings FFND also owns. 15.5% of FFND's money is in holdings BCGD also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
7 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in BCGD and 86 in FFND, against full books of 79 and 177.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 60 positions for FFND that do not appear in our book for BCGD (63.6% of the fund), and 18 for BCGD that do not appear in FFND (39.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BCGD | Weight in FFND | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.69% | 4.40% | 1.29% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.10% | 3.34% | 2.76% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 6.91% | 1.36% | 5.55% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 6.64% | 1.20% | 5.44% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.14% | 1.58% | 1.56% |
| TMOThermo Fisher | 1.79% | 1.42% | 0.37% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.95% | 2.16% | 1.21% |
31.2% of BCGD is already inside FFND.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCGD or FFND?
BCGD has an expense ratio of 0.75% while FFND charges 1.00%. BCGD is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BCGD or FFND?
Over the past year BCGD returned +1.41% vs +3.68% for FFND, so FFND leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BCGD and FFND?
31.2% of BCGD's money is in holdings FFND also owns. 15.5% of FFND's is in holdings BCGD also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in BCGD and 86 in FFND.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCGD or FFND?
BCGD yields 0.00% while FFND yields 0.62%, so FFND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FFND better than BCGD?
BCGD has a lower expense ratio. FFND led over 1Y. FFND is less concentrated, with 27.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.