BDVG vs FFLG
iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, BDVG or FFLG?
Each has led over a different period.
FFLG has a lower expense ratio. BDVG led over 1Y, FFLG over 3Y and the full window. BDVG is less concentrated, with 43.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BDVG | FFLG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.38%Best |
| AUM | - | $635M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.38% | 0.07% |
| Holdings | 85 | 202 |
| YTD Return | +17.47%Best | +11.11% |
| 1Y Return | +20.24%Best | +14.85% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.49% | +25.80%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8%Best | 19.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.5%Best | -26.7% |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $15,499 | $19,934Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.4%Best | 57.3% |
| Fund Family | iMGP Funds | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2023 | Feb 2, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 30, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.3 years).
BDVG vs FFLG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.
BDVG vs FFLG Performance
iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) is an ETF from iMGP Funds and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year BDVG returned +20.24% while FFLG returned +14.85%. Year to date, BDVG is up 17.47% versus a gain of 11.11% for FFLG.
Over three years, BDVG compounded at +17.49% per year against +25.80% for FFLG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 10.8% for BDVG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.5% for BDVG and -26.7% for FFLG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BDVG charges 0.55% per year while FFLG charges 0.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $38 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BDVG currently yields 1.38% against 0.07% for FFLG.
Holdings Overlap
12.8% of BDVG's money is in holdings FFLG also owns. 12.0% of FFLG's money is in holdings BDVG also owns.
BDVG and FFLG share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BDVG and 101 in FFLG, against full books of 85 and 202.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 83 positions for FFLG that do not appear in our book for BDVG (81.4% of the fund), and 34 for BDVG that do not appear in FFLG (81.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BDVG and FFLG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BDVG or FFLG?
BDVG has an expense ratio of 0.55% while FFLG charges 0.38%. FFLG is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BDVG or FFLG?
Over the past year BDVG returned +20.24% vs +14.85% for FFLG, so BDVG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BDVG or FFLG?
FFLG has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 10.8% for BDVG. Worst drawdown: BDVG -14.5% vs FFLG -26.7%.
Should I hold both BDVG and FFLG?
BDVG and FFLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BDVG and FFLG?
12.8% of BDVG's money is in holdings FFLG also owns. 12.0% of FFLG's is in holdings BDVG also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BDVG and 101 in FFLG.
Which pays a higher dividend, BDVG or FFLG?
BDVG yields 1.38% while FFLG yields 0.07%, so BDVG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FFLG better than BDVG?
FFLG has a lower expense ratio. BDVG led over 1Y, FFLG over 3Y and the full window. BDVG is less concentrated, with 43.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.