BDVG vs VOO
iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BDVG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BDVG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 41 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +19.92% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.07% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.38% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iMGP Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BDVG vs VOO Performance
iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) is a ETF from iMGP Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BDVG returned +25.07% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, BDVG is up 19.92% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, BDVG compounded at +16.38% per year against +21.55% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, BDVG has the edge at +15.81% annualized vs +13.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 10.9% for BDVG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.5% for BDVG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BDVG charges 0.55% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BDVG currently yields 1.49% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BDVG and VOO share 38 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BDVG or VOO?
BDVG has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BDVG or VOO?
Over the past year BDVG returned +25.07% vs +21.63% for VOO, so BDVG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BDVG annualized +15.81% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BDVG or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 10.9% for BDVG. Worst drawdown: BDVG -14.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BDVG and VOO?
BDVG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BDVG and VOO?
BDVG and VOO share 38 common holdings with a 17.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BDVG or VOO?
BDVG yields 1.49% while VOO yields 1.09%, so BDVG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.