BDVG vs IVV
iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BDVG or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BDVG led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BDVG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | - | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.42% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 42 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +17.31%Best | +12.39% |
| 1Y Return | +19.98%Best | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.37% | +21.38%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8%Best | 12.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.5%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $15,419 | $17,855Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.0% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | iMGP Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 30, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.2 years).
BDVG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
BDVG vs IVV Performance
iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) is an ETF from iMGP Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BDVG returned +19.98% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, BDVG is up 17.31% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Over three years, BDVG compounded at +16.37% per year against +21.38% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.7% compared with 10.8% for BDVG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.5% for BDVG and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BDVG charges 0.55% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BDVG currently yields 1.42% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
88.7% of BDVG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 22.7% of IVV's money is in holdings BDVG also owns.
Most of BDVG is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
35 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BDVG and 490 in IVV, against full books of 42 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 447 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BDVG (75.9% of the fund), and 3 for BDVG that do not appear in IVV (5.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BDVG | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.12% | 7.02% | 2.90% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.48% | 5.69% | 2.21% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.38% | 1.44% | 2.94% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 5.30% | 0.20% | 5.10% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 4.19% | 0.66% | 3.53% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 4.09% | 0.68% | 3.41% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 4.15% | 0.58% | 3.57% |
| NUENucor Corp. | 4.55% | 0.09% | 4.46% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 3.54% | 0.61% | 2.93% |
| NSCNorfolk Southern Corp | 3.18% | 0.12% | 3.06% |
88.7% of BDVG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BDVG or IVV?
BDVG has an expense ratio of 0.55% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BDVG or IVV?
Over the past year BDVG returned +19.98% vs +16.61% for IVV, so BDVG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BDVG or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.7% annualized versus 10.8% for BDVG. Worst drawdown: BDVG -14.5% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both BDVG and IVV?
BDVG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BDVG and IVV?
88.7% of BDVG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 22.7% of IVV's is in holdings BDVG also owns. They hold 35 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BDVG and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BDVG or IVV?
BDVG yields 1.42% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BDVG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BDVG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BDVG led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.