BDVG vs IVV
iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BDVG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BDVG | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 41 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +18.84% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.26% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.04% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iMGP Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
BDVG vs IVV Performance
iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) is a ETF from iMGP Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BDVG returned +25.26% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, BDVG is up 18.84% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Over three years, BDVG compounded at +16.04% per year against +21.47% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, BDVG has the edge at +15.49% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.9% for BDVG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.5% for BDVG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BDVG charges 0.55% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BDVG currently yields 1.49% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BDVG and IVV share 37 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BDVG or IVV?
BDVG has an expense ratio of 0.55% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BDVG or IVV?
Over the past year BDVG returned +25.26% vs +22.61% for IVV, so BDVG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BDVG annualized +15.49% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BDVG or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.9% for BDVG. Worst drawdown: BDVG -14.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BDVG and IVV?
BDVG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BDVG and IVV?
BDVG and IVV share 37 common holdings with a 17.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BDVG or IVV?
BDVG yields 1.49% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BDVG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.