BDVG vs QQQ
iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BDVG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | - | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 41 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +19.65% | +19.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.13% | +26.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.27% | +26.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | iMGP Funds | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BDVG vs QQQ Performance
iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) is a ETF from iMGP Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BDVG returned +24.13% while QQQ returned +26.75%. Year to date, BDVG is up 19.65% versus a gain of 19.68% for QQQ.
Over three years, BDVG compounded at +16.27% per year against +26.25% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, BDVG has the edge at +15.71% annualized vs +13.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 10.9% for BDVG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.5% for BDVG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BDVG charges 0.55% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $18 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BDVG currently yields 1.49% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BDVG and QQQ share 9 holdings out of 135 unique holdings combined, representing a 14.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BDVG or QQQ?
BDVG has an expense ratio of 0.55% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BDVG or QQQ?
Over the past year BDVG returned +24.13% vs +26.75% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BDVG annualized +15.71% vs +13.15% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BDVG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 10.9% for BDVG. Worst drawdown: BDVG -14.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BDVG and QQQ?
BDVG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BDVG and QQQ?
BDVG and QQQ share 9 common holdings with a 14.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 135 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BDVG or QQQ?
BDVG yields 1.49% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so BDVG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.