BEDY vs PRF

BEDY vs PRF

Which is better, BEDY or PRF?

PRF has been ahead.

PRF has a lower expense ratio. PRF led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: PRFHigher Returns (1Y): PRF

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBEDYPRF
Expense Ratio0.50%0.34%Best
AUM$336M$10.0B
Dividend Yield5.87%1.31%
Holdings1222,004
YTD Return+17.58%+21.33%Best
1Y Return+20.50%+24.66%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.97%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.73%
Fund FamilyBNY Mellon Investment ManagementInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionDec 8, 2025Dec 19, 2005

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

BEDY vs PRF growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare BEDY against instead:BEDY vs SPYBEDY vs QQQBEDY vs VOOBEDY vs VTIPRF against:PRF vs VXUS

BEDY vs PRF Performance

BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend and Income ETF (BEDY) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BEDY returned +20.50% while PRF returned +24.66%. Year to date, BEDY is up 17.58% versus a gain of 21.33% for PRF.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BEDY charges 0.50% per year while PRF charges 0.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $34 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BEDY currently yields 5.87% against 1.31% for PRF.

Holdings Overlap

PRF already in BEDY21.7%

At least 21.7% of PRF's money is in holdings BEDY also owns.

Stated as a floor: for BEDY, our book for it covers 92.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

PRF and BEDY share little of their money.

58 positions in common, counted across the 59 positions we hold weights for in BEDY and 994 in PRF, against full books of 122 and 2,004.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BEDYWeight in PRFDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.56%3.25%2.31%
JPMJpmorgan Chase4.08%1.61%2.47%
UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated3.01%1.22%1.79%
TAT&T Inc.3.20%0.71%2.49%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares2.94%0.72%2.22%
FITBFifth Third Bancorp3.25%0.11%3.14%
XOMExxonmobil Corp.1.10%1.99%0.89%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common1.87%1.04%0.83%
CLColgate-Palmolive Co2.51%0.11%2.40%
SLBSchlumberger Nv.2.45%0.16%2.29%

21.7% of PRF is already inside BEDY.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BEDYPRF

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BEDY or PRF?

BEDY has an expense ratio of 0.50% while PRF charges 0.34%. PRF is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BEDY or PRF?

Over the past year BEDY returned +20.50% vs +24.66% for PRF, so PRF leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between BEDY and PRF?

At least 21.7% of PRF's money is in holdings BEDY also owns. Our book for BEDY is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 58 positions in common, counted across the 59 positions we hold weights for in BEDY and 994 in PRF.

Which pays a higher dividend, BEDY or PRF?

BEDY yields 5.87% while PRF yields 1.31%, so BEDY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PRF better than BEDY?

PRF has a lower expense ratio. PRF led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.