BGIG vs SCHD
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGIG | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $2.2B | $112.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.83% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 103 | |
| YTD Return | +13.74% | +27.60% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.78% | +29.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.44% | +16.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.9% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Bahl & Gaynor | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2023 | Oct 20, 2011 |
BGIG vs SCHD Performance
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG) is a ETF from Bahl & Gaynor and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year BGIG returned +18.78% while SCHD returned +29.63%. Year to date, BGIG is up 13.74% versus a gain of 27.60% for SCHD.
Over three years, BGIG compounded at +16.44% per year against +16.43% for SCHD. Across the full 3-year window we track, BGIG has the edge at +16.44% annualized vs +11.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 8.9% for BGIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for BGIG and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGIG charges 0.45% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $6 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGIG currently yields 1.83% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
BGIG and SCHD share 10 holdings out of 141 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGIG or SCHD?
BGIG has an expense ratio of 0.45% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $39 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BGIG or SCHD?
Over the past year BGIG returned +18.78% vs +29.63% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BGIG annualized +16.44% vs +11.54% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BGIG or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 8.9% for BGIG. Worst drawdown: BGIG -13.2% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both BGIG and SCHD?
BGIG and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BGIG and SCHD?
BGIG and SCHD share 10 common holdings with a 15.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 141 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGIG or SCHD?
BGIG yields 1.83% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.