BGIG vs VTI
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGIG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.3B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.83% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.49% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.98% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.89% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Bahl & Gaynor | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
BGIG vs VTI Performance
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG) is a ETF from Bahl & Gaynor and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BGIG returned +19.98% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, BGIG is up 14.49% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, BGIG compounded at +16.89% per year against +21.54% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, BGIG has the edge at +16.89% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 9.0% for BGIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for BGIG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGIG charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGIG currently yields 1.83% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BGIG and VTI share 47 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGIG or VTI?
BGIG has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BGIG or VTI?
Over the past year BGIG returned +19.98% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BGIG annualized +16.89% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BGIG or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 9.0% for BGIG. Worst drawdown: BGIG -13.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BGIG and VTI?
BGIG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BGIG and VTI?
BGIG and VTI share 47 common holdings with a 17.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGIG or VTI?
BGIG yields 1.83% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BGIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.