BGIG vs VYM
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, BGIG or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGIG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $2.2B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.83% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 55 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +11.95%Best | +10.96% |
| 1Y Return | +15.18% | +15.42%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.84% | +17.78%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.05% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.1%Best | 10.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2%Best | -14.5% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $15,404 | $15,959Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.7% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Bahl & Gaynor | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 15, 2023 to Sep 22, 2026 (3 years).
BGIG vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
BGIG vs VYM Performance
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG) is an ETF from Bahl & Gaynor and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BGIG returned +15.18% while VYM returned +15.42%. Year to date, BGIG is up 11.95% versus a gain of 10.96% for VYM.
Over three years, BGIG compounded at +16.84% per year against +17.78% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.9% compared with 9.1% for BGIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for BGIG and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGIG charges 0.45% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $4 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGIG currently yields 1.83% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
78.3% of BGIG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 36.0% of VYM's money is in holdings BGIG also owns.
Most of BGIG is already inside VYM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
38 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in BGIG and 557 in VYM, against full books of 55 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 491 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for BGIG (61.1% of the fund), and 9 for BGIG that do not appear in VYM (16.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BGIG | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.67% | 7.35% | 2.68% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.13% | 3.82% | 0.69% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 4.13% | 2.51% | 1.62% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 4.44% | 1.52% | 2.92% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 4.03% | 1.80% | 2.23% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.58% | 1.86% | 0.72% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 2.90% | 1.48% | 1.42% |
| PNCPnc Financial Services Group Inc. | 3.92% | 0.41% | 3.51% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.27% | 2.63% | 1.36% |
| APOAthene (Ath) / Apollo Global Management (Apo) | 3.60% | 0.21% | 3.39% |
78.3% of BGIG is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGIG or VYM?
BGIG has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BGIG or VYM?
Over the past year BGIG returned +15.18% vs +15.42% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BGIG or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 10.9% annualized versus 9.1% for BGIG. Worst drawdown: BGIG -13.2% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both BGIG and VYM?
BGIG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BGIG and VYM?
78.3% of BGIG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 36.0% of VYM's is in holdings BGIG also owns. They hold 38 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in BGIG and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGIG or VYM?
BGIG yields 1.83% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than BGIG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.