BGIG vs QQQ
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BGIG or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. BGIG is less concentrated, with 41.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGIG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $2.2B | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.83% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 51 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +10.55% | +22.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.79% | +24.33%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.50% | +29.05%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.00% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.2%Best | 17.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $15,153 | $20,358Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.2%Best | 47.2% |
| Fund Family | Bahl & Gaynor | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 15, 2023 to Oct 2, 2026 (3 years).
BGIG vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
BGIG vs QQQ Performance
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG) is an ETF from Bahl & Gaynor and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BGIG returned +11.79% while QQQ returned +24.33%. Year to date, BGIG is up 10.55% versus a gain of 22.67% for QQQ.
Over three years, BGIG compounded at +17.50% per year against +29.05% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 9.2% for BGIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for BGIG and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGIG charges 0.45% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $18 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGIG currently yields 1.83% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
17.8% of BGIG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 12.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings BGIG also owns.
BGIG and QQQ share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in BGIG and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 51 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 89 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for BGIG (85.0% of the fund), and 38 for BGIG that do not appear in QQQ (74.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BGIG | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.93% | 5.88% | 0.95% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.61% | 2.74% | 1.87% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.54% | 1.95% | 0.59% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1.74% | 0.48% | 1.26% |
| MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv | 1.76% | 0.35% | 1.41% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 0.77% | 1.08% | 0.31% |
| FASTFastenal Co. | 1.43% | 0.25% | 1.18% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BGIG and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGIG or QQQ?
BGIG has an expense ratio of 0.45% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BGIG or QQQ?
Over the past year BGIG returned +11.79% vs +24.33% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BGIG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 9.2% for BGIG. Worst drawdown: BGIG -13.2% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both BGIG and QQQ?
BGIG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BGIG and QQQ?
17.8% of BGIG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 12.7% of QQQ's is in holdings BGIG also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in BGIG and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGIG or QQQ?
BGIG yields 1.83% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so BGIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BGIG?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. BGIG is less concentrated, with 41.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.