BGIG vs QQQ
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGIG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $2.3B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.83% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +16.54% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.83% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.71% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.0% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Bahl & Gaynor | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BGIG vs QQQ Performance
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG) is a ETF from Bahl & Gaynor and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BGIG returned +22.83% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, BGIG is up 16.54% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, BGIG compounded at +17.71% per year against +26.64% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, BGIG has the edge at +17.71% annualized vs +13.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 9.0% for BGIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for BGIG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGIG charges 0.45% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $18 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGIG currently yields 1.83% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BGIG and QQQ share 9 holdings out of 143 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGIG or QQQ?
BGIG has an expense ratio of 0.45% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BGIG or QQQ?
Over the past year BGIG returned +22.83% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BGIG annualized +17.71% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BGIG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 9.0% for BGIG. Worst drawdown: BGIG -13.2% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BGIG and QQQ?
BGIG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BGIG and QQQ?
BGIG and QQQ share 9 common holdings with a 11.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 143 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGIG or QQQ?
BGIG yields 1.83% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BGIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.