BGIG vs VOO
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BGIG or VOO?
VOO has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGIG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.2B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.83% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 55 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +11.95% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.18% | +17.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.84% | +23.04%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.63% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.1%Best | 12.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $15,404 | $18,065Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.7% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Bahl & Gaynor | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 15, 2023 to Sep 22, 2026 (3 years).
BGIG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
BGIG vs VOO Performance
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG) is an ETF from Bahl & Gaynor and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BGIG returned +15.18% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, BGIG is up 11.95% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Over three years, BGIG compounded at +16.84% per year against +23.04% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 9.1% for BGIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for BGIG and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGIG charges 0.45% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGIG currently yields 1.83% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
92.2% of BGIG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 21.5% of VOO's money is in holdings BGIG also owns.
Most of BGIG is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
46 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in BGIG and 494 in VOO, against full books of 55 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 442 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for BGIG (77.7% of the fund), and 1 for BGIG that do not appear in VOO (2.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BGIG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.01% | 5.36% | 0.35% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.67% | 2.86% | 1.81% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 4.13% | 0.96% | 3.17% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 4.44% | 0.58% | 3.86% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 4.03% | 0.69% | 3.34% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.19% | 1.41% | 1.78% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.13% | 1.46% | 1.67% |
| PNCPnc Financial Services Group Inc. | 3.92% | 0.16% | 3.76% |
| APOAthene (Ath) / Apollo Global Management (Apo) | 3.60% | 0.09% | 3.51% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 2.90% | 0.57% | 2.33% |
92.2% of BGIG is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGIG or VOO?
BGIG has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BGIG or VOO?
Over the past year BGIG returned +15.18% vs +17.31% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BGIG or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 9.1% for BGIG. Worst drawdown: BGIG -13.2% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both BGIG and VOO?
BGIG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BGIG and VOO?
92.2% of BGIG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 21.5% of VOO's is in holdings BGIG also owns. They hold 46 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in BGIG and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGIG or VOO?
BGIG yields 1.83% while VOO yields 1.04%, so BGIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than BGIG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.