BGRO vs VTI
iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BGRO or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGRO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 34 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +13.79%Best | +12.30% |
| 1Y Return | +12.86% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 12.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.9% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $14,239 | $14,676Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 51.1% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 5, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.3 years).
BGRO vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
BGRO vs VTI Performance
iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF (BGRO) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BGRO returned +12.86% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, BGRO is up 13.79% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BGRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 12.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.9% for BGRO and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGRO charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGRO currently yields 0.03% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
92.8% of BGRO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 40.6% of VTI's money is in holdings BGRO also owns.
Most of BGRO is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
33 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in BGRO and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 34 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,117 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BGRO (56.8% of the fund), and 3 for BGRO that do not appear in VTI (3.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BGRO | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 12.43% | 6.40% | 6.03% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.85% | 4.79% | 2.06% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.55% | 6.29% | 1.74% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.42% | 3.65% | 0.77% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 5.04% | 2.90% | 2.14% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.06% | 2.56% | 0.50% |
| SNOWSnowflake Inc | 5.42% | 0.13% | 5.29% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.32% | 1.29% | 2.03% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 1.52% | 2.31% | 0.79% |
92.8% of BGRO is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGRO or VTI?
BGRO has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BGRO or VTI?
Over the past year BGRO returned +12.86% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BGRO annualized +16.61% vs +18.15% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BGRO or VTI?
BGRO has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 12.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BGRO -24.9% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both BGRO and VTI?
BGRO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BGRO and VTI?
92.8% of BGRO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 40.6% of VTI's is in holdings BGRO also owns. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in BGRO and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGRO or VTI?
BGRO yields 0.03% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BGRO?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.