BKLC vs VYM
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, BKLC or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
BKLC has a lower expense ratio. BKLC led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKLC | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00%Best | 0.04% |
| AUM | $7.0B | $95.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.61% | 2.23% |
| Holdings | 506 | 610 |
| YTD Return | +11.10% | +15.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.32% | +19.62%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.69%Best | +19.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.83%Best | +11.48% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 13.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -26.1% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,490Best | $17,218 |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.9% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 9, 2020 to Nov 13, 2026 (6.6 years).
BKLC vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.6 years both funds cover.
BKLC vs VYM Performance
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKLC returned +13.32% while VYM returned +19.62%. Year to date, BKLC is up 11.10% versus a gain of 15.95% for VYM.
Over three years, BKLC compounded at +20.69% per year against +19.64% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.83% and +11.48% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, BKLC has the edge at +17.98% annualized vs +15.07%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKLC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 13.7% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.1% for BKLC and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKLC charges 0.00% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $4 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKLC currently yields 1.61% against 2.23% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
34.8% of BKLC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 91.1% of VYM's money is in holdings BKLC also owns.
Most of VYM is already inside BKLC. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, BKLC as of Nov 1, 2026 and VYM as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
229 positions in common, counted across the 503 positions we hold weights for in BKLC and 602 in VYM, against full books of 506 and 610.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 348 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for BKLC (8.6% of the fund), and 263 for BKLC that do not appear in VYM (65.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BKLC | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.32% | 6.94% | 4.62% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 1.37% | 3.83% | 2.46% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 1.19% | 2.70% | 1.51% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.01% | 2.58% | 1.57% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.80% | 1.83% | 1.03% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.63% | 1.76% | 1.13% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 0.67% | 1.54% | 0.87% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 0.47% | 1.65% | 1.18% |
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 0.56% | 1.47% | 0.91% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Inc. | 0.56% | 1.42% | 0.86% |
91.1% of VYM is already inside BKLC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKLC or VYM?
BKLC has an expense ratio of 0.00% while VYM charges 0.04%. BKLC is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BKLC or VYM?
Over the past year BKLC returned +13.32% vs +19.62% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BKLC annualized +17.98% vs +15.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BKLC or VYM?
BKLC has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 13.7% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BKLC -26.1% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both BKLC and VYM?
BKLC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BKLC and VYM?
91.1% of VYM's money is in holdings BKLC also owns. 91.1% of VYM's is in holdings BKLC also owns. They hold 229 positions in common, counted across the 503 positions we hold weights for in BKLC and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKLC or VYM?
BKLC yields 1.61% while VYM yields 2.23%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than BKLC?
BKLC has a lower expense ratio. BKLC led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.