BKLC vs VOO
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
BKLC has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKLC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $5.7B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.60% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -62.28% | +13.25% | |
| 1Y Return | -60.06% | +19.96% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -15.47% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -9.36% | +12.81% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BKLC vs VOO Performance
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) is a ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKLC returned -60.06% while VOO returned +19.96%. Year to date, BKLC is down 62.28% versus a gain of 13.25% for VOO.
Over three years, BKLC compounded at -15.47% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -9.36% and +12.81% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.49% annualized vs +0.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKLC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.0% for BKLC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKLC charges 0.00% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKLC currently yields 1.60% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BKLC and VOO share 413 holdings out of 588 unique holdings combined, representing a 90.8% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKLC or VOO?
BKLC has an expense ratio of 0.00% while VOO charges 0.03%. BKLC is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKLC or VOO?
Over the past year BKLC returned -60.06% vs +19.96% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BKLC annualized +0.16% vs +13.49% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKLC or VOO?
BKLC has been the more volatile fund at 31.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BKLC -68.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BKLC and VOO?
BKLC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKLC and VOO?
BKLC and VOO share 413 common holdings with a 90.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 588 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKLC or VOO?
BKLC yields 1.60% while VOO yields 1.08%, so BKLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.