BRW vs IVV
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BRW or IVV?
Bank Loan against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BRW | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.43% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $368M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 13.86% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 1,064 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +0.31% | +12.24%Best |
| 1Y Return | -10.68% | +18.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.56% | +20.98%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.51% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5%Best | 15.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -71.4% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,707 | $18,230Best |
| Fund Family | Saba Capital | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Bank Loan | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 12, 1988 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 19, 2000 to Sep 9, 2026 (26.3 years).
BRW vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BRW vs IVV Performance
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) is an ETF from Saba Capital and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BRW returned -10.68% while IVV returned +18.61%. Year to date, BRW is up 0.31% versus a gain of 12.24% for IVV.
Over three years, BRW compounded at +7.56% per year against +20.98% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.51% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.97% annualized vs -1.09%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.5% for BRW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -71.4% for BRW and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BRW charges 1.43% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $143 vs $3 annually, a gap of $140 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BRW currently yields 13.86% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 39.5% of IVV's money is in holdings BRW also owns.
Stated as a floor: for BRW, our book for it covers 61.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 370 days apart, BRW as of Jul 31, 2025 and IVV as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
98 positions in common, counted across the 532 positions we hold weights for in BRW and 505 in IVV, against full books of 1,064 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BRW | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | -0.06% | 7.98% | 8.04% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | -0.09% | 5.44% | 5.53% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | -0.51% | 4.01% | 4.52% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | -0.46% | 2.56% | 3.02% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | -0.39% | 1.94% | 2.33% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | -0.01% | 1.51% | 1.52% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 0.00% | 1.36% | 1.36% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | -0.04% | 1.39% | 1.43% |
| VVisa Inc | -0.12% | 0.92% | 1.04% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Inc. | -0.03% | 0.56% | 0.59% |
39.5% of IVV is already inside BRW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BRW or IVV?
BRW has an expense ratio of 1.43% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $140 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BRW or IVV?
Over the past year BRW returned -10.68% vs +18.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), BRW annualized -1.09% vs +6.97% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BRW or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.5% for BRW. Worst drawdown: BRW -71.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BRW and IVV?
BRW and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BRW and IVV?
At least 39.5% of IVV's money is in holdings BRW also owns. Our book for BRW is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 98 positions in common, counted across the 532 positions we hold weights for in BRW and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BRW or IVV?
BRW yields 13.86% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BRW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BRW?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.