BSCP vs IVV
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSCP | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.9B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.83% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +0.07% | +13.22% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.07% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +0.83% | +22.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.74% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 7, 2015 | May 15, 2000 |
BSCP vs IVV Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BSCP returned -0.07% while IVV returned +21.62%. Year to date, BSCP is up 0.07% versus a gain of 13.22% for IVV.
Over three years, BSCP compounded at +0.83% per year against +22.17% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -1.74% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.02% annualized vs +0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 4.1% for BSCP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.5% for BSCP and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSCP charges 0.10% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $3 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSCP currently yields 3.83% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BSCP and IVV share 0 holdings out of 553 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSCP or IVV?
BSCP has an expense ratio of 0.10% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $7 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSCP or IVV?
Over the past year BSCP returned -0.07% vs +21.62% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), BSCP annualized +0.30% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSCP or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 4.1% for BSCP. Worst drawdown: BSCP -15.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BSCP and IVV?
BSCP and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSCP and IVV?
BSCP and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 553 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSCP or IVV?
BSCP yields 3.83% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BSCP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.