BSCP vs QQQ
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
BSCP has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSCP | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1.9B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.83% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +0.07% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.07% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +0.83% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.74% | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 7, 2015 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BSCP vs QQQ Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BSCP returned -0.07% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, BSCP is up 0.07% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, BSCP compounded at +0.83% per year against +26.64% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -1.74% and +15.36% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs +0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 4.1% for BSCP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.5% for BSCP and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSCP charges 0.10% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $18 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSCP currently yields 3.83% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BSCP and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 150 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSCP or QQQ?
BSCP has an expense ratio of 0.10% while QQQ charges 0.18%. BSCP is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $8 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSCP or QQQ?
Over the past year BSCP returned -0.07% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), BSCP annualized +0.30% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSCP or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 4.1% for BSCP. Worst drawdown: BSCP -15.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BSCP and QQQ?
BSCP and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSCP and QQQ?
BSCP and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 150 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSCP or QQQ?
BSCP yields 3.83% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BSCP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.