CANC vs SCHD
Tema Oncology ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. CANC delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CANC | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $196M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.05% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 56 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +24.69% | +25.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +70.17% | +32.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.38% | +15.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.70% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.3% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -26.1% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Tema Global Limited | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 15, 2023 | Oct 20, 2011 |
CANC vs SCHD Performance
Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) is a ETF from Tema Global Limited and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year CANC returned +70.17% while SCHD returned +32.31%. Year to date, CANC is up 24.69% versus a gain of 25.33% for SCHD.
Over three years, CANC compounded at +22.38% per year against +15.40% for SCHD. Across the full 3-year window we track, CANC has the edge at +22.38% annualized vs +11.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CANC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.3% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.1% for CANC and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CANC charges 0.75% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $6 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CANC currently yields 0.05% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
CANC and SCHD share 3 holdings out of 154 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CANC or SCHD?
CANC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $69 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CANC or SCHD?
Over the past year CANC returned +70.17% vs +32.31% for SCHD, so CANC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), CANC annualized +22.38% vs +11.45% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CANC or SCHD?
CANC has been the more volatile fund at 19.3% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: CANC -26.1% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both CANC and SCHD?
CANC and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CANC and SCHD?
CANC and SCHD share 3 common holdings with a 9.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 154 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CANC or SCHD?
CANC yields 0.05% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.