CCSO vs SECT
Carbon Collective Climate Solutions US Equity ETF vs Main Sector Rotation ETF
Which is better, CCSO or SECT?
SECT has been ahead.
CCSO has a lower expense ratio. SECT led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. CCSO is less concentrated, with 49.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCSO | SECT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35%Best | 0.69% |
| AUM | $45M | $2.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.64% | 0.69% |
| Holdings | 124 | 19 |
| YTD Return | -2.23% | +10.85%Best |
| 1Y Return | -5.45% | +13.79%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.32% | +18.99%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.76% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.0% | 14.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.7% | -21.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.1 years | $12,911 | $19,344Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.7%Best | 100.0% |
| Fund Family | Carbon Collective Funds | Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 19, 2022 | Sep 5, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 20, 2022 to Oct 15, 2026 (4.1 years).
CCSO vs SECT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.1 years both funds cover.
CCSO vs SECT Performance
Carbon Collective Climate Solutions US Equity ETF (CCSO) is an ETF from Carbon Collective Funds and Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) is an ETF from Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC. Over the past year CCSO returned -5.45% while SECT returned +13.79%. Year to date, CCSO is down 2.23% versus a gain of 10.85% for SECT.
Over three years, CCSO compounded at +12.32% per year against +18.99% for SECT. Across the full 4-year window we track, SECT has the edge at +17.46% annualized vs +6.43%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CCSO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.0% compared with 14.0% for SECT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.7% for CCSO and -21.7% for SECT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCSO charges 0.35% per year while SECT charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $69 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCSO currently yields 0.64% against 0.69% for SECT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 123 holdings in CCSO and 10 in SECT, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 123 positions we hold weights for in CCSO and 10 in SECT, against full books of 124 and 19.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for SECT that do not appear in our book for CCSO (100.0% of the fund), and 92 for CCSO that do not appear in SECT (85.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CCSO and SECT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCSO or SECT?
CCSO has an expense ratio of 0.35% while SECT charges 0.69%. CCSO is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CCSO or SECT?
Over the past year CCSO returned -5.45% vs +13.79% for SECT, so SECT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CCSO annualized +6.43% vs +17.46% for SECT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CCSO or SECT?
CCSO has been the more volatile fund at 22.0% annualized versus 14.0% for SECT. Worst drawdown: CCSO -23.7% vs SECT -21.7%.
Should I hold both CCSO and SECT?
CCSO and SECT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCSO or SECT?
CCSO yields 0.64% while SECT yields 0.69%, so SECT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SECT better than CCSO?
CCSO has a lower expense ratio. SECT led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. CCSO is less concentrated, with 49.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.