CGGG vs IVV
Capital Group US Large Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CGGG or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGGG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $67M | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.09% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 86 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +3.79% | +14.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.63% | +17.32%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.33% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 11.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -17.8% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,491 | $12,975Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 60.2% | 38.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2025 to Oct 6, 2026 (1.3 years).
CGGG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
CGGG vs IVV Performance
Capital Group US Large Growth ETF (CGGG) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CGGG returned +2.63% while IVV returned +17.32%. Year to date, CGGG is up 3.79% versus a gain of 14.98% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 11.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.8% for CGGG and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGGG charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGGG currently yields 0.09% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
83.5% of CGGG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 41.7% of IVV's money is in holdings CGGG also owns.
Most of CGGG is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
30 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in CGGG and 505 in IVV, against full books of 86 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 467 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for CGGG (57.5% of the fund), and 13 for CGGG that do not appear in IVV (15.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGGG | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 12.02% | 8.00% | 4.02% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 9.81% | 2.40% | 7.41% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.27% | 5.57% | 0.70% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 8.19% | 2.59% | 5.60% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.36% | 7.39% | 5.03% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 5.97% | 2.15% | 3.82% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.37% | 1.66% | 2.71% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.65% | 3.80% | 2.15% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 4.28% | 0.31% | 3.97% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 3.68% | 0.70% | 2.98% |
83.5% of CGGG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGGG or IVV?
CGGG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGGG or IVV?
Over the past year CGGG returned +2.63% vs +17.32% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CGGG annualized +11.28% vs +22.18% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGGG or IVV?
CGGG has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 11.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CGGG -17.8% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both CGGG and IVV?
CGGG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGGG and IVV?
83.5% of CGGG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 41.7% of IVV's is in holdings CGGG also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in CGGG and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGGG or IVV?
CGGG yields 0.09% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than CGGG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.