CSIO vs VXUS
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, CSIO or VXUS?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSIO | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $46M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.46% | 2.59% |
| Holdings | 31 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +15.00% | +16.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +27.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.09% |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CSIO vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CSIO vs VXUS Performance
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF (CSIO) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, CSIO is up 15.00% versus a gain of 16.15% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSIO charges 0.65% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $5 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSIO currently yields 1.46% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 32.1% of CSIO's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CSIO and 8,094 in VXUS, against full books of 31 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CSIO | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRP:CATc Energy Corp | 6.11% | 0.15% | 5.96% |
| APA:AUApa Corp | 4.38% | 0.02% | 4.36% |
| CPLE3:BVCompanhia Paranaense De Energia - Copel Registered Shares Ordinary Common Shares | 4.03% | 0.01% | 4.02% |
| FER:ASFerrovial Se | 3.52% | 0.07% | 3.45% |
| ICT:PHIntl Container Term Svcs Php1 | 3.28% | 0.04% | 3.24% |
| TENA:MYTenaga Nasional Bhd | 3.15% | 0.04% | 3.11% |
| CNI:CACanadian Natl Railway Co | 2.67% | 0.14% | 2.53% |
| ADPORTS:AEAbu Dhabi Ports Company PJSC | 2.08% | 0.00% | 2.08% |
| 2688:KY130,467Enn Energy Holdings Ltd. | 1.65% | 0.01% | 1.64% |
| ASURB:MXGrupo Aeroportuario Del Sureste Sa De Cv | 1.21% | 0.01% | 1.20% |
32.1% of CSIO is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSIO or VXUS?
CSIO has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between CSIO and VXUS?
At least 32.1% of CSIO's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CSIO and 8,094 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSIO or VXUS?
CSIO yields 1.46% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than CSIO?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.