CSIO vs VOO

CSIO vs VOO

Which is better, CSIO or VOO?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCSIOVOO
Expense Ratio0.65%0.03%Best
AUM$46M$997.4B
Dividend Yield1.47%1.04%
Holdings31509
YTD Return+11.96%+12.37%Best
1Y Return-+16.61%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.37%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.49%
Top 10 Weight52.3%37.6%Best
Fund FamilyCohen & Steers FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 9, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

CSIO vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

CSIO vs VOO Performance

Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF (CSIO) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, CSIO is up 11.96% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CSIO charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSIO currently yields 1.47% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

CSIO already in VOO50.3%
VOO already in CSIO1.4%

50.3% of CSIO's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.4% of VOO's money is in holdings CSIO also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

11 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CSIO and 494 in VOO, against full books of 31 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 476 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for CSIO (97.8% of the fund), and 4 for CSIO that do not appear in VOO (5.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CSIOWeight in VOODifference
CSXCsx Corp.7.26%0.15%7.11%
WMBWilliams Cos. Inc.6.36%0.14%6.22%
ETREntergy Corp.5.89%0.08%5.81%
UNPUnion Pacific Corp5.08%0.27%4.81%
NEENextera Energy Inc5.06%0.28%4.78%
AEEAmeren Corporation Utilities4.15%0.05%4.10%
LNTAlliant Energy Corp.3.96%0.03%3.93%
AMTAmerican Tower Corporation3.75%0.13%3.62%
EVRGEvergy Inc.3.43%0.03%3.40%
DTEDte Energy Co.3.17%0.05%3.12%

50.3% of CSIO is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

CSIOVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CSIO or VOO?

CSIO has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between CSIO and VOO?

50.3% of CSIO's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.4% of VOO's is in holdings CSIO also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CSIO and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, CSIO or VOO?

CSIO yields 1.47% while VOO yields 1.04%, so CSIO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than CSIO?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.