CSIO vs VYM

CSIO vs VYM

Which is better, CSIO or VYM?

VYM costs less.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCSIOVYM
Expense Ratio0.65%0.04%Best
AUM$46M$81.6B
Dividend Yield1.46%2.24%
Holdings31613
YTD Return+15.00%Best+14.82%
1Y Return-+20.84%
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.64%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.28%
Top 10 Weight52.3%25.9%Best
Fund FamilyCohen & Steers FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionDec 9, 2025Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

CSIO vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

CSIO vs VYM Performance

Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF (CSIO) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, CSIO is up 15.00% versus a gain of 14.82% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CSIO charges 0.65% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $4 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSIO currently yields 1.46% against 2.24% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

CSIO already in VYM41.6%
VYM already in CSIO2.9%

41.6% of CSIO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 2.9% of VYM's money is in holdings CSIO also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

10 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CSIO and 603 in VYM, against full books of 31 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 559 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for CSIO (94.5% of the fund), and 4 for CSIO that do not appear in VYM (14.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CSIOWeight in VYMDifference
WMBWilliams Cos. Inc.6.36%0.38%5.98%
ETREntergy Corp.5.89%0.22%5.67%
NEENextera Energy Inc5.06%0.76%4.30%
UNPUnion Pacific Corp5.08%0.67%4.41%
AEEAmeren Corporation Utilities4.15%0.13%4.02%
LNTAlliant Energy Corp.3.96%0.08%3.88%
EVRGEvergy Inc.3.43%0.08%3.35%
DTEDte Energy Co.3.17%0.13%3.04%
DUKDuke Energy Corp2.16%0.41%1.75%
BKHBlack Hills Corp2.33%0.02%2.31%

41.6% of CSIO is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

CSIOVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CSIO or VYM?

CSIO has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between CSIO and VYM?

41.6% of CSIO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 2.9% of VYM's is in holdings CSIO also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CSIO and 603 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, CSIO or VYM?

CSIO yields 1.46% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than CSIO?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.