CSIO vs VTI
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CSIO or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSIO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $46M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.46% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 31 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +15.00%Best | +13.59% |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.95% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.81% |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CSIO vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CSIO vs VTI Performance
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF (CSIO) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, CSIO is up 15.00% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSIO charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSIO currently yields 1.46% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 52.4% of CSIO's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
13 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CSIO and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 31 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CSIO | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSXCsx Corp. | 7.26% | 0.12% | 7.14% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 6.36% | 0.12% | 6.24% |
| ETREntergy Corp. | 5.89% | 0.08% | 5.81% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 5.06% | 0.25% | 4.81% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 5.08% | 0.22% | 4.86% |
| AEEAmeren Corporation Utilities | 4.15% | 0.04% | 4.11% |
| LNTAlliant Energy Corp. | 3.96% | 0.03% | 3.93% |
| AMTAmerican Tower Corporation | 3.75% | 0.10% | 3.65% |
| EVRGEvergy Inc. | 3.43% | 0.03% | 3.40% |
| DTEDte Energy Co. | 3.17% | 0.04% | 3.13% |
52.4% of CSIO is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSIO or VTI?
CSIO has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between CSIO and VTI?
At least 52.4% of CSIO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CSIO and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSIO or VTI?
CSIO yields 1.46% while VTI yields 1.07%, so CSIO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CSIO?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.