DAK vs IVV
Dakota Active Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DAK or IVV?
Nearly the same fund. IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. DAK is less concentrated, with 32.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DAK | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.43% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $44M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 140 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +12.17% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.26% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8%Best | 12.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -7.9%Best | -8.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $11,973 | $12,101Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.9%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Dakota | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 30, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.1 years).
DAK vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
DAK vs IVV Performance
Dakota Active Equity ETF (DAK) is an ETF from Dakota and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DAK returned +15.26% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, DAK is up 12.17% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 11.8% for DAK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.9% for DAK and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DAK charges 0.43% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $43 vs $3 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DAK currently yields 0.73% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
77.9% of DAK's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 60.7% of IVV's money is in holdings DAK also owns.
Most of DAK is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
115 positions in common, counted across the 139 positions we hold weights for in DAK and 490 in IVV, against full books of 140 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 367 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DAK (38.0% of the fund), and 21 for DAK that do not appear in IVV (21.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DAK | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.92% | 7.02% | 1.10% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.43% | 8.07% | 5.64% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.28% | 5.69% | 2.41% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.39% | 3.84% | 1.45% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 3.32% | 2.39% | 0.93% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.03% | 1.44% | 1.59% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 1.18% | 3.00% | 1.82% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.62% | 1.16% | 1.46% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 2.50% | 0.27% | 2.23% |
| BKBank Of New York Mellon Corp | 2.53% | 0.17% | 2.36% |
77.9% of DAK is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DAK or IVV?
DAK has an expense ratio of 0.43% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $40 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DAK or IVV?
Over the past year DAK returned +15.26% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), DAK annualized +17.79% vs +18.93% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DAK or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 11.8% for DAK. Worst drawdown: DAK -7.9% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both DAK and IVV?
DAK and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DAK and IVV?
77.9% of DAK's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 60.7% of IVV's is in holdings DAK also owns. They hold 115 positions in common, counted across the 139 positions we hold weights for in DAK and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DAK or IVV?
DAK yields 0.73% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DAK?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. DAK is less concentrated, with 32.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.