DAK vs IVV
Dakota Active Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DAK | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.43% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $42M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.76% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 170 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +13.12% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.42% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -7.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Dakota | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
DAK vs IVV Performance
Dakota Active Equity ETF (DAK) is a ETF from Dakota and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DAK returned +21.42% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, DAK is up 13.12% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.1% for DAK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.9% for DAK and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DAK charges 0.43% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $43 vs $3 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DAK currently yields 0.76% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DAK and IVV share 114 holdings out of 529 unique holdings combined, representing a 40.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DAK or IVV?
DAK has an expense ratio of 0.43% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DAK or IVV?
Over the past year DAK returned +21.42% vs +22.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), DAK annualized +20.74% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DAK or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.1% for DAK. Worst drawdown: DAK -7.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DAK and IVV?
DAK and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between DAK and IVV?
DAK and IVV share 114 common holdings with a 40.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 529 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DAK or IVV?
DAK yields 0.76% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.